Nearly every person who lines up for the flu shot is given no information about the vaccine. If people were given the vaccine insert to read, for example, they’d learn that it’s never been scientifically tested at all.
GlaxoSmithKline’s FluLaval insert states that “there have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLULAVAL.”
The insert isn’t provided because the more a person reads its admissions, the more skeptical they would become. By reading further, one would find that the shot may actually be dangerous to pregnant women.
“Safety and effectiveness of FLULAVAL have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers or children,” the insert reads.
Reading further, one finds that, “Safety and effectiveness of FLUVAL in pediatric patients have not been established.” So why does the CDC recommend that children now receive the flu shot? Is it all just a big government-endorsed scam?
Even more, “FLULAVAL has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.” Are those who line up for the jab merely just blind test rats?
Flu shot recipients are blind test rats
Even though the flu shot is a shot in the dark, medical professionals and pharmacists push it blindly, not informing the people they jab. In this way, medical professionals routinely violate the standards of informed consent that are spelled out in the American Medical Association’s Code of Ethics:
The patient’s right of self-decision can be effectively exercised only if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice. The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment. The physician’s obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient’s care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice.
Vaccine makers take “educated guesses” about what flu virus strains to use each year
With no efficacy established, no safety guaranteed and no one there to inform patients, all sanity is lost. Everyone’s trying to prevent disease in the dark, using untested science and potentially dangerous modalities.
The flu shot became even more laughable in 2014 when the CDC admitted that it pretty much doesn’t even work! As the H3N2 virus takes off, we now know that this year’s flu vaccine didn’t contain the strain. Vaccine makers take “educated guesses” each year when developing the flu shot. It’s all just a crap-shoot, yet people continue to line up without any information on the damages that the shot can actually inflict.
Why aren’t flu shot recipients warned about this long list of flu shot side effects?
In fact, the FluLaval insert warns about various side effects. “In addition to reports in clinical trials, the following adverse events have been identified during postapproval use of FLULAVAL.”
The list includes:
- chest pain
- allergic edema of the mouth
- muscle weakness
- Guillian-Barre syndrome
- facial or cranial nerve paralysis
- limb paralysis
A list like this proves that flu vaccines are not medicine at all, but instead a biological weapon of filth that does more harm than prevention.
Mercury levels go unpublished by government drug regulators
Then there’s the admission that the vaccine contains thimerosal, a mercury derivative. In 2014, Mike Adams conducted an ICP-MS heavy metals analysis of the FluLaval vaccine in the Natural News Forensic Food Lab and found a shocking amount of mercury in the flu shot. The amount was 51 ppm — which is 100 times higher than the highest level of mercury we’ve ever tested in contaminated fish!
Why haven’t government safety agencies (like the FDA and CDC) tested the mercury levels, and why haven’t they pulled these poisonous injections from the market? Why do Americans continue to take these biological weapons in the arm as if they are actual preventative medicine?
Since flu shots are such a hoax, why are state governments trying to pass laws that take away an individual’s right to choose what goes into their body? Some state lawmakers are trying to take away a person’s right to informed consent and conscientious and religious objection to being drugged against their will. Read more about forced vaccination bills in the pipeline at Health Impact News.
No one should have to answer to anybody — no government, no pharmaceutical company — for what goes into their body or their children’s body.
Sources for this article include: