MANDATORY RFID CHIPS TO REPLACE FOOD STAMPS & WELFARE ATM DEBIT CARDS !!!
Food Stamps To Be Ended Unless Microchipped!!
Food stamp welfare individuals must soon be chipped
“And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” (Revelation 13:16-17)
In a little while, the above scene in Revelation 13 will become a global reality. People can no longer buy or sell without the mark of the beast. And sometimes that would mean no longer being able to eat!
The USDA is now considering biometric identification for all individuals who will want to benefit from their Food and Nutrition Services. The RFID chip may just soon be a must for everyone who does not want to starve!
The following is an excerpt of the executive summary of the FINAL REPORT of the Use of Biometric Identification Technology to Reduce Fraud in the Food Stamp Program:
Biometric identification technology provides automated methods to identify a person based on physical characteristics—such as fingerprints, hand shape, and characteristics of the eyes and face—as well as behavioral characteristics—including signatures and voice patterns.
Already operational in some states
Biometric identification systems are currently operational at some level in Arizona, California (under county initiative, first by Los Angeles County), Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Texas. Finger imaging is the principal form of technology used in all eight States, though alternative technologies have simultaneously undergone trials in Massachusetts (facial recognition) and Illinois (retinal scanning). By the end of 2000, new systems are expected to be in place in California (statewide unified system), Delaware, and North Carolina. Other States are currently in the initial planning stages, including Florida, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina. However, there is little information available at this point regarding the specific course and trajectory these States will follow in terms of system types, implementation schedules, and the benefit programs in which they will implement the new requirement.
The States planned for implementation of their biometric identification systems in response to a wide variety of factors and considerations idiosyncratic to each State environment. Some States reported that their respective legislative mandates, which prescribed specific dates by which biometric systems were required to be in place, allowed insufficient time for development and planning. The States developed and followed implementation schedules in accordance with internal priorities and considerations. The States uniformly described their implementation processes as largely uneventful, though they encountered a variety of minor implementation issues, most of which were associated with the logistical difficulties of mobilizing and managing such a complex initiative.
Preparing staff for the implementation of the biometric systems, both philosophically and operationally, took different forms, priorities, and levels of effort in the States. At implementation, advance notification to clients and/or the general public about new biometric client identification procedures was considered important by all State representatives. The objective of providing advance notification was to inform and prepare clients for the additional application or recertification step (i.e., to explain the requirement and who is required to submit, and to address client concerns), as well as to accelerate enrollment of the existing caseload. All States prepared informational mailings to clients advising them of the new requirement. Some States reported developing additional outreach media including multilingual (English and Spanish) videos, posters, and brochures for viewing and distribution in the local office. Most of the States also identified various outlets in the community through which they informed the general public in advance about the implementation of biometric client identification procedures.
Program outcomes
The evaluations of finger imaging systems conducted by six States have produced the following findings.
- A small number of duplicate applications (approximately 1 duplicate for every 5,000 cases) have been detected by finger imaging systems. Finger-imaging systems appear to detect more fraud in statewide implementations than in regional pilot systems. Additional matches have been found by interstate comparisons of finger-image data.
- Institution of a finger-imaging requirement can produce a significant, short-term reduction in caseload, because some existing clients refuse to comply with the requirement. The number of refusals depends on the implementation procedures and appears to be lower when finger imaging is incorporated into the recertification process.
- The most carefully controlled estimate of non-compliance among existing clients suggests that introduction of a finger-imaging requirement reduces participation by approximately 1.3%. However, this estimate reflects both reduced fraud and deterrence of eligible individuals and households.
I dare you to go to the WIC website, or the EBT website or the SNAP/Food stamp website or the Grocery Manufacturers of america,the food and drug admins, etc. etc. Go to there search field browser and type in RFID,or biometric and WATCH what pops up. I also have Government Links to show the validity of this video.
Go Google this entire sentence….. “Planned Nationwide Usage of the biometric information sharing capability by fiscal year 2009-2013? As well as these below.
-Go Google “The human robot operating system” PDF (Super Smoking Gun Proof)
Go to FMI Dot Org. Type 2011 RFID in the search field
Go to www.fns.usda.gov/snap/ebt/ AND TYPE IN 2011 BIOMETRIC OR RFID
Go to youtube and type in “Biometric ID Cards Replace Cash mark of the beast”
Go to youtube and type in
” louisana bans cash”
Go Google “Biometrics dot gov Fingerprint recognition”
Analysis of Alternatives for Implementing a Cash Value Voucher Program
IBM RFID Commercial E Business THE MARK OF THE BEAST 666
Source
USDA Nutrition Assistance Program
Eddie L. is the founder and owner of WorldTruth.TV. This website is dedicated to educating and informing people with articles on powerful and concealed information from around the world. I have spent the last 30+ years researching Bible, History, Secret Societies, Symbolism, and Kabbalah
3 comments
Mike Cechanowicz June 14, 2012 9:59 am
First they will try to chip those they feel they can morally force to chip - the welfare cases. At the same time they will try to eliminate cash, forcing most people to use their mobile phones or credit cards for all transactions - it will be a hassle - and then they will say everybody needs a chip so they don't have the hassle of bothering with stuff they can lose. Those that do not want to be chipped will be treated as "outsiders" or criminals and in this way they have total control of a totally enslaved population. Now the first part has started. How far are you willing to let it go?
peter June 5, 2012 11:46 am
its funny in a way . and not just the cost of it , but then you have to put in place a system for reading it as well . the really funny part of it all . fraud would be so much easier to do , just carry a scanner . copy the code . and bingo you cot free food ! So in this case let them do it . see ho fast the drop it
mark May 31, 2012 8:11 am
It starts with people no one gives a shit about. people just laugh and say "its only welfare bums" but.............................. give it time and it will be YOU wont be laughing then when you MANDATORY chip is on its way.